|
| |
Town of Quartzsite previously admonished for attempting takeover of
tourism
Council
votes to disavow Chamber organizations; attempts to assume Chamber and tourism duties

Businessman Norm McGuinness, left, and Councilman Walt Akin
Controversial consultant Lance Decker at the community meeting
Quartzsite's Town Council met Tuesday evening before an audience interested in
their review of the information provided to them by Lance Decker, of Lance
Decker LLC. Decker was retained for $7500 by the council to consider the dual
Chamber of Commerce issue in Quartzsite.
Decker's organization provided an 18-page document titled "Report to the Town of
Quartzsite Chambers of Commerce Controversy," dated October 3, 2007, for which
the Town of Quartzsite has agreed to pay $7500.00. Critics are many, varied and
vocal.
"What are we doing with this guy?" one local businessman asked at Friday's
meeting. "When is the town going to address the real issues: overtaxation - the
backwards approach to bringing new business into Quartzsite - we just lost a
major franchise because they [the decision makers] were not able to
tolerate the tax structure here." [We must purposely omit the name of this
business owner at this time.]
His comments were echoed throughout the morning, from many of the attendees.
Whether or not the council actually voted to hire the consultant is, at this
point, unclear. But Decker's report was accepted and acted upon prior to
Friday's meeting, which was actually publicized only after the acceptance of
Decker's recommendations, presented at Tuesday's council meeting.
In the report, described by Decker at the community meeting Friday to contain
only his opinions on the Chamber of Commerce issue, Decker concluded that the Town of Quartzsite
should assume responsibility for
"Quartzsite's development and economic future," by "immediately bringing those
activities into an integrated programmatic system within the Town's
administrative organization."
Decker concluded by indicating the Chambers of Commerce be officially
'unrecognized,' and that the town assume the duties commonly undertaken by
Chambers of Commerce and the Tourism Bureau -- and that everyone, state agencies
included, be notified of the town's actions and encouraged to do the same.
The copy of the letter is expected to be made public Monday, October 15, 2007.
According to those familiar with the policies commonly governing the
relationships between Chambers of Commerce and the towns that benefit from them,
the recommendation itself was flawed: Quartzsite's council members cannot simply
vote to disallow the Chamber of Commerce the 'right or privilege' of promoting
the Town of Quartzsite on a local, regional, state and national level: and in
this situation the
original Chamber of Commerce is recognized by the State Chamber of Commerce's
governing board as well as national agencies and it has the tourism designation recognized by the State of
Arizona.
In both Decker's report and his presentation he alluded to the fact that things
needed to be accomplished under the official guidelines of the US Chambers of
Commerce. Decker has been repeatedly advised that the original Chamber of
Commerce has the official designations already in place.
The US Chambers of Commerce recognizes the Quartzsite Chamber of Commerce, and
the organization is in good standing with them. The tourism designation was
awarded years ago, and the requirements to maintain it have been properly
managed, according to the state tourism department.
Also at issue: Decker's 'formal' recommendations were presented in a proposal
that was not a scientific report -- that did not cite sources or take polls or
surveys into account. Instead, it was simply presented as another 'opinion' on
the dual Chambers of Commerce issue, quoting a variety of comments [all from
unidentified sources] and, ultimately, one that did not even involve itself with
the business community that has heretofore supported the Chambers of Commerce in
their efforts to represent the businesses in the region -- something the town is
often criticized for consistently failing to consider.
Decker failed to interview some of those most closely associated with the
Chambers of Commerce, in spite of promises to 'get back to them,' and, instead,
quoted verbatim the comments of people not associated with nor members of the
chambers or the boards of directors of each entity.
Paul Winer, board member of the Business Chamber of Commerce and a local
business owner, confronted Decker openly during the community meeting, when
Decker spoke about him and his business only to get his name wrong in front of
the audience.
When informed of his misstep, Decker again failed to properly note his name and
immediately [again] publicly called him 'Frank,' Winer demanded accountability
on the part of the controversial consultant. "You don't even know who I am -- do
you Dick?" Winer asked, as he stood and commanded the attention of those
attending the meeting -- just prior to walking out.
Attendants further decried the council's actions, indicating that the council itself is overstepping its
stated authority in an attempt to shut down
both Chambers of Commerce on the basis of Decker's report. "The original Chamber
of Commerce is a viable and independent entity: whether the Town of Quartzsite
chooses to recognize it or not," stated Angie Masales, Director of the Chamber
of Commerce and Tourism Bureau. "We will be moving ahead with our Chamber's
duties, and hope - somehow - that the Town of Quartzsite will concern itself
with the issues commonly considered to be under the jurisdiction of the Town. We
aren't going to quit being a Chamber of Commerce just because the current
council members in Quartzsite choose to ignore our authority," stated Masales.
"We have been around long before they were council members -- and we will be
here long after they are retired or not reelected." she said. "We have worked
for many years to establish a sound Chamber of Commerce that can support the
businesses here: we aren't going anywhere. The fact that they assume they can
require us to stop representing our clients is absurd."
Representatives of the original Chamber of Commerce agreed, as did original
Chamber of Commerce Board President C. Richard Oldham.
"I was Mayor of Quartzsite for three terms," Oldham stated. "We have to
recognize the limitations of being councilmen: we can't order our constituents
about, telling them what to do because it seems beneficial at the time to one or
more members of the council."
"The State of Arizona has a great deal to say about how we conduct ourselves as
councilmen. We don't have the authority to just order a civic organization out
of existence."
Those facts, however, did not prevent Quartzsite's councilmen from addressing
the issue at hand with openly antagonistic verbal assaults against the
organizations.
The council utilizes a forum demanding that representatives of the audience
submit to a three minute timeframe in which they are to frame their comments and
make their case. Three light bulbs of different color indicate green to speak,
yellow to wrap up and red to stop speaking. Another method is using a stop watch
and gavel. When the three minutes is exceeded, the speaker is gaveled down and
admonished to stop speaking.
The forum rules are a point of contention for citizens who have attended
meetings trying to find 'common ground' with Quartzsite's council.
"If this is the level of childishness to which we have to be subjected," Masales
stated, "it's no wonder they assume they can order us to disband or stop
promoting Quartzsite or the businesses thereof. They don't want to hear
solutions, answers -- they don't provide a forum in which genuine progress can
be made or measured. We attend, make our statements, and sit quietly while they
go on and do what they intended to do from the beginning.
"In light of the unchanging climate of the council and town manager, we are
simply going to have to continue doing the work for which we were commissioned,
with or without the support of the Town. It's not what we want: but they
won't hold those positions forever."
Of course, the 'support of the Council' would appear to include the payment
of funds allocated to the town, for distribution to those organizations which
actually do the work, as delineated according to the State of Arizona.
Therefore, Quartzsite's Councilmen cannot simply and independently vote to withhold
those funds: they are ultimately answerable to a higher authority.
At this time, the 'higher authority' in question does not appear to be in support of Quartzsite's decision to
try to 'starve' the original Chamber of Commerce out of existence. In fact, the
original Chamber of Commerce organization has the full support of state
officials in continuing its mission in spite of the problems the Chamber is
currently encountering with the council.
Will it be necessary for overseers to eventually come in to evaluate the actions
of Quartzsite's Town Council?
"We heard from the Town of Quartzsite some time back -- requesting that we turn
the tourism designation over to the Town of Quartzsite: something neither legal
nor prudent. We advised them that they do not meet the necessary criteria -- and
cannot do so," a representative of the State of Arizona stated. "The town can't
assume the responsibilities of a Chamber of Commerce in good standing with the
State of Arizona, either, even if it were legal for them to assume those duties
associated with the Chamber of Commerce and tourism."
It's clear that the citizens of Quartzsite are quite disillusioned with the
sitting council, the meeting deteriorated into diatribes against the current
officials and offering comments ranging from facilitating recalls to meeting the
new election with renewed vigor to oust those least popular candidates, and
replacing members of the council with businesspeople, more inclined to
understand the needs of the business community.
With nearly five million winter visitors last year, Quartzsite has become more
than just a popular winter destination -- it's an excellent choice for viable
business endeavors that should be cultivated and encouraged. However, without
proper leadership, Quartzsite continues to flounder, promises of coming
businesses that never materialize.
The sitting Mayor, Verlyn Michaels, originally utilized WalMart as a campaign
platform. Today, seven years later, WalMart still has not entered into
negotiations to bring the store to Quartzsite -- and denies ever having done so.
"Michaels has been saying they're in negotiations with WalMart and he's
lying," one executive stated. I deal with WalMart
executives - we've sold land to WalMart in other cities. When we bring up
Quartzsite they laugh! The leadership here is horrible -- and everyone knows
that. They're not coming here until Quartzsite pays attention to business.
"We just built a building in [a large western city] and we don't have to pay taxes for seven
years," he continued. "These are the kinds of business issues we never see
addressed in Quartzsite. This meeting, this whole thing -- is just more of the
same."
"What is the town doing blowing $7500 for just another opinion?" he questioned,
"Where is the accountability here?"
|